Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-02-21 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-02-21 House Journal Page 2836 HB 172 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 172 An Act relating to kindergarten programs and compulsory education; to identification required upon enrollment in a public school; to those grades that constitute elementary, junior, and secondary school; and providing for an effective date. with the: Journal Page HES RPT 3DP 1NR 1343 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 1343 FIN RPT 7NR 1617 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 4/18/95 1617 The following fiscal note applies: Zero fiscal note, Dept. of Education, 2/21/96 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Bunde: Page 3, line 5: Delete 1995 Insert 1996 Representative Bunde moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 were not offered. 1996-02-21 House Journal Page 2837 HB 172 Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 2, lines 21-22: Delete before August 15 following the beginning of Insert by the first day of ªBEFORE AUGUST 15 FOLLOWING THE BEGINNING OFß Representative B.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HB 172(efd am) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 29 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Moses, Navarre, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Toohey, Williams, Willis Nays: G.Davis, Hanley, Kelly, Masek, Parnell, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Excused: Nicholia Absent: Davies, Mulder And so, Amendment No. 4 was adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 2, line 25: Delete six ªSEVENß Insert five ªSEVENß 1996-02-21 House Journal Page 2838 HB 172 Page 2, line 28: Delete six ªSEVENß Insert five ªSEVENß Representative B.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The Speaker invoked Section 102 of Masons Manual. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HB 172 am Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Nicholia Absent: Davies, Mulder And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. The Speaker stated that HB 172 am will be in third reading on tomorrows calendar.